Amit Gefen, PhD
Disclosure: This work was supported by grant no.
6418-6 from the Chief Scientist’s Office of the Ministry
of Health, Israel.
Pressure-related chronic wounds, such as diabetic
neuropathic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers, are an
important health concern that affect millions of patients
and costs billions annually.1 Studies conducted at
multiple centers in the United States indicate that ulcers
in the feet of patients with diabetic neuropathy account
for $150 million (US) of the direct annual costs of type
2 diabetes. Deep tissue damage requiring amputation
costs about $47,000 per individual case.1 Likewise,
the database of the US Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) indicates that the annual cost
of treating pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury (SCI)
patients is $1.2 billion in the US alone.2
Pressure-related chronic wounds may occur when soft
tissues are compressed between bony prominences—
eg, the metatarsal heads in the foot or the ischial
tuberosities (IT) in the buttocks and a supporting
surface (a shoe insole or a wheelchair sitting surface).
Injury occurs when the magnitude of the applied
mechanical load or time of exposure to the load, or
their combination, exceeds the tissue’s tolerance,
which is commonly referred to as “injury threshold.”
In such cases, cell death occurs in paths of mechanical
breakdown,or ischemic necrosis, or both.3 Pressurerelated
chronic wounds rarely develop spontaneously
in animals, sometimes limiting utilization of animal
models for etiological studies.4 Accordingly, much of
our understanding of these wounds is based on clinical
experience5 that emphasizes a need for objective,
quantitative means of measurements of the conditions
under which pressure-related chronic wounds develop
in humans. Interface pressure data are measures of the
spatial and temporal compressive forces per unit area
that act on soft tissues contacting a support surface
(eg, wheelchair, shoe, etc.). They are basic engineering
tools for evaluating the susceptibility of an individual
to suffer a pressurerelated wound. Though interface
pressure measurements cannot reveal all risk factors
for a chronic pressure-related wound (eg, existence of
a peripheral vascular disease) they do reflect important
biomechanical risk factors, such as loss of tissue
thickness that causes higher intensity pressure near
bony prominences, foot deformities, regions of callus
in plantar tissue, and nonenzymatic glycosylation of
collagen that induces stiffening of connective tissues
in the plantar foot.6
current techniques for body-support interface pressure
measurements with focus on foot and sitting pressures,
2) list the pressure value ranges measured under the
foot in standing and walking, under the buttocks in
sitting with particular emphasis on abnormal alterations
in foot pressures as result of diabetic neuropathy, and
alterations in sitting pressures among paralyzed patients,
and 3) discuss clinical utilization of interface pressure
measurements in the fitting of diabetic footwear and
wheelchair cushions.
Role of Interface Pressure Measurements in
Prevention of Diabetic Foot Ulcerations and
Pressure Ulcers
Diabetic foot ulcers are a common and potentially
severe complication of diabetes that affect up to 68 per
1000 patients with diabetes per year in the US.5 More
than half of these patients develop infection while 20%
require some form of amputation to remove necrotic
tissue.5 The key risk factors for diabetic foot ulceration
include peripheral neuropathy, foot deformity, loss
of plantar pad thickness, abnormal stiffening of the
foot sole resulting from changes in collagen fiber
architecture, and repetitive focal mechanical loads causing micro tears in the plantar pad.6 It is likely that
the prevalence of complications and amputations can
be lowered substantially if those patients at risk can be
identified and equipped with protective measures, such
as customdesigned foot wear. While examinations of
the level of sensation in the foot (eg, Semmes-Weinstein
filaments) are able to quantify foot neuropathy, they
cannot identify specific areas of the foot that are
susceptible to ulceration (ie, the filaments are merely
used to assess loss of sensation).
Conversely, identifying the specific regions in a
patient’s foot that are at risk is an initial, basic step
before any footwear modification can be made. Foot
pressure measurements are able to reveal the highly
loaded regions on the foot during static as well as
dynamic activities, which then permits a patient-specific
footwear prescription so that high focal pressures are
relieved. An example of this is if an elevated pressure
region is detected below one of the metatarsal heads, a
plug made of soft material can be inserted into the shoe
midsole at that site causing the shoe to deform more
at the region of the plug. This increases the foot-shoe
local contact area at the problematic region, which
in turn, alleviates the high focal pressures.7 Interface
pressure measurements have the potential of being
a highly useful, practical tool for helping to protect
diabetic neuropathic patients from ulceration.
Interface pressure measurements are also important in
protecting permanent wheelchair users from pressure
ulcers. Current pressure ulcer rates are unacceptably
high in at-risk populations as up to 23% of all nursing
home residents and 60% of persons with SCI develop
pressure ulcers.8 The US Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) reports a generally lower
incidence rate for inpatients (> 11%).9 Comparably,
54% of these pressure ulcers occur in 70- to 89-yearold
hospitalized patients.9 Surgical repair of buttock
ulcers may be more than $70,000 per case, hence,
between $3.5 and $7 billion are spent each year in the
US on this malady.8
The ischial tuberosities, the sacral coccygeal area, and
the greater and lesser trochanters and intertrochanteric
crests support most sitting pressures. Prolonged
sitting by patients with neurological impairment and
physical disability can lead to pressure ulcers at these
sites since the soft tissues deformed between the
bones and wheelchair support are deprived of oxygen
and nutrients because of blood vessel obstruction or
occlusion. Moreover, muscle atrophy in paralyzed
patients reduces the natural cushioning abilities of the
buttock’s soft tissues, which increases the buttocksseat interface pressures. Similarly to diabetic foot
ulcers, the prevalence andseverity of pressure ulcers
in permanent wheelchair users can be substantially
decreased if patients at risk are equipped with tailormade
protective means. For example, addition of
foams or creating cutouts of cushion material at
regions of high focal sitting pressures can redistribute
the mechanical loads and improve capillary blood flow
in the skin and subdermal tissues.10 Overall, interface
pressure measurements are useful for determining the
anatomical sites that require pressure redistribution and
for quantifying the extent of improvements achieved
by optional interventions.
Technological Concepts
Units. In most of the clinical and engineering literature,
pressures are specified using standard international
(SI) units so that pressure is the force in Newtons
acting over the contact area in square meters.This is
the definition of the Pascal (Pa) unit. Foot and sitting
pressures are usually reported in kilopascals (kPa, 1
kPa = 1000 Pa). Other units found in the literature for
reporting pressures are kg/cm2, where 100 kPa are
approximately 1 kg/cm2, and millimeters of mercury
(mmHg) where 100 kPa are approximately 750 mmHg.
All data in this review are provided in kPa as well as in
mmHg for standardization and for convenience.
Device configurations. The pressure-sensing devices
on the market vary in sensor configuration to meet
different applications. For monitoring foot pressures,
devices can be generally classified as pressure
distribution platforms or in-shoe systems. Pressure
distribution platforms can be used for static or dynamic
(standing or walking) studies and are made of a flat
rigid array of pressure sensing elements arranged
in a matrix configuration. Since these matrix sensor
configurations need to be embedded in the floor for a
natural gait, use of pressure distribution platforms is
generally restricted to gait laboratories. For the subject
to walk naturally on the pressure platform, and for the
foot to hit the center of the pressure-sensing area so
that optimal measurements can be taken, training the
subjects is usually required. Additionally, pressure
distribution platforms can only measure the interaction
of the barefoot with a rigid ground, since footwear will
cause the platform to measure the pressures between
the shoe and ground, not the foot and the shoe. For
evaluation of footwear, a commonality in examining
patients with diabetes, an in-shoe sensor configuration
is needed. This configuration is needed after the regions of high pressures during barefoot gait are
identified with a pressure distribution platform. The
in-shoe sensors are thin, flexible, and embedded in a
thin insole that is inserted under the foot while walking
with shoes. Unlike the pressure distribution platforms,
which record pressures during a single step, inshoe
systems record several subsequent steps and, therefore,
statistical analysis of pressure data is more powerful
at a shorter study time. In-shoe systems may act at a
wireless configuration and/or may be connected to a
portable small data-logger that allows monitoring of
footshoe pressure distributions at the patient’s daily
environment while wearing his/her own shoes or some
alternative therapeutic shoes. Thus, in-shoe systems
can be effective for prescribing the most suitable
footwear solution for a patient with diabetes. However,
the spatial resolution of pressure data obtained with inshoe
systems is generally lower than when pressure
distribution platforms are employed, as fewer sensors
are used in the inshoe devices.
Similarly to the foot pressure-sensing devices, sitting
pressure measurements can be made with a pressure
distribution sitting platform that determines the pressures
between the buttocks and a rigid foundation—ie, the
platform. Pressures between the patient’s buttocks
and his/her own wheelchair or wheelchair cushion
can be measured with a thin, flexible array of sensors
(a pressure mat), which covers the entire sitting area.
While the first (rigid) type is used mostly for research
purposes— eg, to determine the effect of a pathology
(such as SCI) on the sitting pressure distributions in a
standard repeatable configuration—the flexible mat is
useful in the clinic for evaluating the relative pressure
relieving effects of different wheelchair or cushion
modifications.
Data and Analysis
Visualization of pressure data is commonly done by
means of color-coded diagrams, which show the area
of contact (under the foot or buttocks) with regions
of high pressure marked using “warm” colors (red or
yellow), and regions of low pressure marked using
“cold” colors (blue or green). Examples are provided in
Figures 1–3. It is also possible to connect points of equal
pressure over the contact region by lines, which yields
an “isobaric” pressure diagram. Some systems use 3-
dimensional topographic maps to visualize pressures,
although this format is less popular. The center of
pressure, defined as the time-dependent location where
the normal force between the body and the supporting
surface acts, is shown on the pressure diagram (Figure
3). For presentation and comparison of statistical data
from groups ofsubjects, it is generally accepted to use
bar graphs plotted at anatomical regions of interest on
a scheme of the contact area (eg, the foot, Figure 1A).
Based upon the pressure diagrams, some parameters
can be further calculated by pressure analysis software
codes. These standard parameters typically include
the contact area, the vertical compression force
(summation of pressure measured at each sensor
multiplied by the sensor’s area), the peak pressure,
the contact area exposed to pressures exceeding a
certain threshold, the average pressure in a circular
area of predefined size (under the ischial tuberosity),
and the pressure-time integral (area bounded under
the pressuretime plot, [Figure 2A]).11–13 Drerup et al13
affirmed that a drawback of such analyses is that they
require the evaluation of one parameter at a time, which
complicates comparative analyses. They suggested use
of “pressure dose” graphic representation, which is a
rectangle with height proportional to the mean pressure
and width proportional to the relative loading time
during the stance phase of walking.13 The area of such
square, therefore, indicates the pressure dose applied
to the foot during a single step.
All pressure parameters can be calculated for the
whole body-support contact area or for specific
regions of interest (Figure 1A). Commercial software
packages for analysis of foot pressure patterns (eg,
the Research Foot software, Tekscan Co., Boston,
Mass) or a comparable Novel Co. (Munich, Germany)
product employ automatic algorithms for subdividing
the foot into anatomical regions of interest for which
local pressure parameters are calculat-ed separately.
Such parametric analyses are useful for quantitative
assessment of pressure data from a patient through a
follow-up period or for statistical analyses of pressure
data from groups of subjects.
Measurement Techniques
Foot and sitting pressure data are both spatial
(pressures are nonuniformly distributed over the
contact area),and temporal (local pressures are timedependent).
As emphasized in this review, pressure
data are most useful for clinical decision-making if both
the spatial and temporal characteristics are acquired
simultaneously,and if objective quantification of the
pressure magnitudes and exposure times is possible.
Simple low-cost pressure measurement methods,
such as those that employ ink (the Harris projection
with fluorescent lights (podoscopes), usually do not
allow simultaneous acquisition of spatial and temporal
pressure data or do not allow the quantification and
storage of the data.14,15 For example, an ink print
of the foot obtained from one stance phase (Harris
projection) shows the regions subjected to maximal
plantar pressures, yet it cannot provide the exposure
times. It is also difficult to quantify the pressure
distribution.14,15 The simultaneous and quantitative
acquisition of spatial and temporal pressure data
generally requires the utilization of electronic or
coupled optical-electronic methods. This review
focuses on such methods. Typically, an electronic
pressure measurement device includes the pressure
sensors embedded in a platform, a sitting mat or an
insole configuration, a computer (for data acquisition,
display, storage, and analysis), and wired or wireless
interface between the sensors and computer. The most
common electronic sensor technologies used in body
pressure measurements employ capacitance sensors,
resistive sensors, piezoelectric and piezoresistive
sensors. All of these sensors are able to provide an
electronic signal (voltage, current) that is proportional
to the pressure applied on the sensor facilitating realtime
computerized production of a pressure-time
response (Figure 2A). Accumulation of data from
multiple sensors allows production of a pressuretime
curve from an entire contact surface (eg, under
the whole foot or some regions of interest under the
buttocks [Figure 2B]).
Capacitance sensors consist of 2 thin, conductive, and
electrically charged plates that are separated by an
insulating “dielectric” elastic layer. When pressure is
applied to the sensor, the dielectric elastic layer deforms,
which shortens the distance between the plates and
results in a voltage change proportional to the pressure
magnitude.14,15 This technology is currently employed
by Novel Co. in its EMED® foot pressure platform, the
Pliance® sitting pressure mat, and the Pedar® insole
system (Novel Co.)
foam encapsulated between 2 electrodes. The electrical
current through the resistive sensor increases as the
conductive layer deforms under pressure. Force-sensing
resistors (FSR), a variation of this technology, are made
of a piezoresistive conductive polymer that changes
resistance in a predictable manner when subjected
to force. The polymer contains both electrically
conducting and nonconducting particles (with sizes in the order of fraction of microns) that are suspended in
matrix. Applying a force or pressure causes conductive
particles to touch each other and the electrodes, thereby
increasing the current through the sensor.14,15 The FSR
technology is employed by Tekscan Co. (Boston,
Mass) in its MatScan® foot pressure platform, its body
pressure measurement system (BPMS™) sitting mat,
and the FScan® in-shoe system (Tekscan Co.)
Fig. 3. Vertebral bodies were dissected and potted in polymethylmethacrylate
using a level to keep the end plate surface flat.
|